Bending for Perfection, NASA Reveals Shape-Shifting Wing Design

Bending for Perfection, NASA Reveals Shape-Shifting Wing Design Bending for Perfection, NASA Reveals Shape-Shifting Wing Design Bending for Perfection, NASA Reveals Shape-Shifting Wing Design The research team tested the lattice structure wing at Langley Research Center to determine the efficiency gained from its design.A team of engineers from NASA and MIT has built a new airplane wing that passively alters its shape to respond to changing aerodynamic loads. The flexible mechanical system, assembled from hundreds of identical molded octahedral unit cells, improves performance during such high angle of attack maneuvers as takeoffs and landings.Traditionally, airplane wing design has always been a compromise. This is because each phase of flighttakeoff, landing, cruising, and maneuveringhas an ideal configuration of wing curvatures and aileron flaps. Designing one wing that operates well in all these phases involves tradeoffs in wing shapes that sacrifice fuel efficiency and increase operating costs.There have been previous attempts at passive wing designs. An example is tow steering, which alters the surface of the wing. This involves building composite wings by placing fiber paths into a curvilinear orientation within the plane of the composite ply. The ability to steer fibers in any direction creates more efficient load paths and weight savings, and enabled engineers to tailor the wings stiffness.Recommended for You VR and Drone Technology in a Paper AirplaneNick Cramer, research engineer for NASAs Ames Research Center in California, said that the NASA-MIT team took a very different approach We are tuning the substructure of the wing rather than the surface of the wing.Instead of thick composite framework and skins, their design consists of octahedral unit cells that contain both stiff and flexible components. They bolt together to form an open but stiff cubooctahedral (eight triangular faces and six square faces) lattice framework covered with a thin homogen ous polymer skin. The wings interior is largely empty spaceand designed to twist in predetermined ways under load.The main difference is the skin of our wing is homogenous, Cramer said. As the wing experiences higher attack angles, the internal lattice structure starts to twist down (or washes out) to maintain control authority. When it enters low angles of attack like your cruise conditions it twists back to a more efficient shape for a natural cruise. This is an important condition for takeoff.Washing out, or wing twisting, is especially important for blended body wings, where there is no clear dividing line between the wings and the main body.A vehicle like the X-48 has a high differentiation of the thickness between the center body section and the tip, Cramer said. This causes the tips to experience significant washing out and impacts performance. Washing out of the tips is necessary to maintain control authority and to avoid stalling out early during takeoff.The researchers tes ted the wing at the NASA Langley Research Center in a subsonic wind tunnel. The actual test results showed an efficiency gain high above expected simulated values. At a low angle of attack of -5, the simulated efficiency gain was expected to be close to 0.05%. In the actual test, the efficiency gains at -5 measured at 0.4%. At 5 angle of attack, the simulated efficiency gain was expected to be below 0%, while in actuality the gain measured 0.3%.Since we are using the wings ability to twist as our primary mechanism for inducing roll, you end up producing proverse yawyawing in the same direction as the turnreducing the need for a vertical tail. Our current design shows you dont need flaps for roll authority. For pitch moment control, the overall aircraft would still need some sort of horizontal tail Cramer said.The main problem with lattice structures is scalability. The team injection molded cells from polyetherimide (PEI) reinforced with 20% short chopped glass fibers and unreinforc ed PEI Ultem 2200. They can produce an octahedral building fraktion every 17 seconds for $0.03 or less per cubic centimeter.The single half span wing they tested contained 2,088 substructure building blocks and took approximately 175 person-hours to construct (roughly 5 minutes per building block). The manual plus-rechnen of a single octahedral building block required three bolted connections at one to two minutes per connection.The teams volumetric throughput was about 5,000 cm3/hr. The researchers believe that the production of discrete lattice material systems will benefit greatly from robotic automation assembly.We built multiple robots during the project for the first stage assembly. These were simple relative robots that were able to climb through the lattice structure. Unlike the sophisticated robots found in larger plants, these simple robots have just one specific task to join the unit cells into the lattice structure Cramer said. The robotic assembly already demonstrated a rate of 40 seconds per building block, nearly 40,000 cm3/hr, eight times faster than the teams output.We started with a fundamental toolbox of components, and as we imagined the design, it was like working with virtual Legos, Cramer said. By limiting our design space, we changed our workflow and created a new design that was built upon a repetitive building block to achieve a unique and promising design.Carlos Gonzalez is special projects editor.You May Also Like NASAs Mars Ice Challenge Heats Up